Log in to Freesound

Problems logging in?
Don't have an account? Join now

Problems logging in?

Enter your email or username below and we'll send you a link to help you login into your account.

Back to log in

Almost there!

We've sent a verification link by email

Didn't receive the email? Check your Spam folder, it may have been caught by a filter. If you still don't see it, you can resend the verification email.

Default title

  • Sounds
  • Tags
  • Forum
  • Map
    • Sounds
    • Packs
    • Forum
    • Map
    • Tags
    • Random sound
    • Charts
    • Donate
    • Help

907_957fwd_957side.flac

Not enough ratings
A
acclivity

January 29th, 2007

Follow
Sound effects > Other mechanisms, engines, machines

Sony microphone comparison. A recording in three sections of a clock ticking, taken from a distance of 1.5 metres. The first 30 seconds was recorded with an ECM-MS907 pointing at the clock. The middle section was using an ECM-MS957 also pointing at the clock. The 3rd section was also with the MS957, but the mic was pointing at the ceiling, and the side capsule rotation knob was set at right-angles to the line of the mic. This last setup seems to have produced the best result. Recorded on an iRiver H120 with 12 dB gain, and using an MZ-N10 in high sensitivity setting as a mic preamp. 30 dB gain was applied in post-processing. How much noise comes from the MZ-N10 I know not.

Sound illegal or offensive? Flag it!
clock
mic
microphone
noise
test
tick

Type

Flac (.flac)

Duration

1:36.370

File size

12.3 MB

Sample rate

44100.0 Hz

Bit depth

16 bit

Channels

Stereo

Comments
Please log in to comment
dobroide

19 years, 1 month ago

ok, I see. The mic specs list is greta, thank you! (note: to follow the link you must drop the trailing bracket)

A
acclivity

19 years, 1 month ago

I did 30 dB post gain simply so you can easily see the waveform in some detail. Otherwise it is hard to see the difference when everything is minute. I can't see it makes any difference to the results, signal and noise are equally amplified. If I had set the MD at low gain, I would have applied more post gain in order to be able to see anything.

pcaeldries

19 years, 1 month ago

Rob Danielson of uwm.edu documents the 907 as having 1mV/Pa sensitivity and 30db(A) self noise. For the 957 this is 8mV/Pa and 25dB(A). That makes them both rather noisy.
(see: http://www.uwm.edu/%7Etype/audio-art-tech-gallery/pages/MicSpecs-Cover.html)
An interesting read also is RaneNote 148: Selecting Mic Preamps. They have it as a pdf on their site.

dobroide

19 years, 1 month ago

looks like the 957 is a tad more sensitive than the 907. But Mike, I can't see why on earth you set the MD at maximum gain *and* added 30 dB in post. Wouldn't the differences among mics, presumably small, become even harder to detect this way? I bet most of the background noise came from the MD + iRiver and that of the mics is hidden somewhere...

  1. 106 downloads
  2. 4 comments
Attribution NonCommercial 4.0
You are free to share (to copy, distribute and transmit) and to remix (to adapt and modify) as long as you credit the author of the sound and do not use the sound for commercial purposes. Get attribution text...
Login to download
Share url:
920 x 245
Embed example, large size
481 x 86
Embed example, medium size
375 x 30
Embed example, small size
About Freesound Terms of use Privacy Cookies Developers Help Donations Blog Freesound Labs Get your t-shirt!
© 2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra