We've sent a verification link by email
Didn't receive the email? Check your Spam folder, it may have been caught by a filter. If you still don't see it, you can resend the verification email.
Based on lullaby 2.wav but with few extra parts.
A loop based on C, C♯, E, F, G♯, A (main transposition of the sigil scale) plus two off scale (blue) notes.
The sigil scale has 4 transpositions:
1. C, C♯, E, F, G♯, A
2. C♯, D, F, F♯, A, A♯
3. D, D♯, F♯, G, A♯, B
4. D♯, E, G, G♯, B, C
I used the main transposition of the sigin scale 1. C, C♯, E, F, G♯, A and two off scale (blue) notes.
I used some Johann Sebastian Bach composotional techniques (not all).
Specifically this scale has near notes (one higher and one lower) and I used them in contrast (Bach would do the same for longer formations; if you are extremely strict on Bach technique, the result sounds old; the ideal compositional thechnique is something between freestyle and rule-abiding).
I AM A PHYSICALIST.
physicalism: atheism without to self-define via something you don't like
physicalism: to accept probabilocracy and mathocracy (rule of probability and mathematics in any possible cosmos)
physicalism: analytical science on any thought, without self-attribution to values, purposes, parts of the definition of personhood and persons
(If you aren't physicalist, you might pick/select some different transitions/interval progressions.
Monarchy is to select the head of state with genetic criteria.
I am an antimonarchist/antiroyalist.
Type
Wave (.wav)
Duration
0:46.615
File size
7.8 MB
Sample rate
44100.0 Hz
Bit depth
16 bit
Channels
Stereo
3 years, 6 months ago
Huge loop with high cutoff applied at the 300 Hz; with some extra lowerings.
https://files.fm/u/tmfqc7kr
Buy a Washburn Dimebag Darrell Signature Stealth 3ST or a black 6 string Solar Guitar for nearly €600 (or a Harley Benton for extreme metal if you don't have money), and mimic the melody.
Actually you have to recompose the synth melody; but lower and with smaller durations/bigger pauses; otherwise the sound will be flabby and unpunctual. Use a generic compressor as the final one (the final one shouldn't be multiband).
Then apply high cutoff at the 300 Hz.
3 years, 6 months ago
That's a bigger looping phrase in series.
A long file; not the sole loop.
Even this is not the final version.
https://file.fm/u/3rawvwy2
3 years, 6 months ago
This is a newer better version:
It has tree different bass notes; the score is not on this new version.
3 years, 6 months ago
I changed tree notes on the bass line, but on a different file.
Here I have the old score and audio version.
3 years, 6 months ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20200925152636/https://justpaste.it/81j23
Nonpersonocratic metaphysics
All religions are false attributing to values, purposes and parts of the definition of personhood, and there is a gradience of this biasing degree. 1. Some religions are explicitly personocratic/personocentric having on their core a single supposedly self-evident, precosmic, cosmogonic and omnicontrolling person (bearer of personhood). 2. Other religions are less personocratic having nonprecosmic, noncentral, noncosmogonic, nonomnicontrolling gods, which might be presented vague in their essence, autistic and missing components of personhood (see: Mary Anne Warren - the criteria for personhood, see: kami). 3. Other religions are atheistic, without a person-god, but still being spiritualistic and supernaturalistic. These are the religions that recognise only an impersonal divine field, still biasedly false attributing to values, purposes and parts of the definition of personhood, ascribed as attributes of any possible cosmos (physical or immaterial).
The other option is physicalism. The analytical evolution of scientific answers to any metaphysical question. There are two ways of completing and correcting the scientific view on reality. 1. observational data; and their corrections, 2. mathematical proofs; but the proofs have to be causally linked and metalogically deep; not based on arbitrary axiomaticity. Also corrections and improvements on reasoning are totally necessary in science.
The archaic metaphysical question gradually evolves:
1. Religion or Science?
2. Metaphysical personocracy of any degree (religion) or science/physicalism/physiocracy (probabilistic events within the natural laws, which have to be elaborated at the deepest causal level as a connectome usually of conditional probability)? [that conditional nonaxiomatic connectome is necessary in theories without the magical person-god; otherwise it's necessary within god; it cannot be avoided]
3. Is the connectome of the component-notions of personhood more fundamental (nonaxiomatic self-sufficient to describe reality at the causal level) than the connectome of the component-notions of physics?
4. Does this metaphysical question on the degrees of personocracy make sense, or is it a personocratic question created by bearers of personhood (persons)? The hardest part in questioning is to form unbiased questions. Biased questions increase the likelihood of biased answers. The components of the definition of personhood aren't cosmically fundamental, nor cosmogonic. The component theories of physics certainly are. Humans are persons and most of them have a preference for personocratic metaphysics. Liking isn't a criterion for truth.
Some people claim that religion is compatible to science; because the universe can be in tandem pro-personhood biased, explicitly or implicitly, having values, purposes and parts or fulfilling the full definition of and criteria for personhood to its causal mechanics; but (the universe can be in tandem) totally impersonal and mathematically accessible without personocratic purpose. Well... actually these people aren't analytical enough to expose their own fallacy.